Legal Opinion

Mendez v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 29, 2015No. 14-497CPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Confidential Informant; Compensation, Restitution, or Reward; Judicial Forfeitures; Breach of Express or Implied-In-Fact Contract; Express or Implied Actual Authority; Subject-Matter Jurisdiction; Statute of Limitations; RCFC 12(b)(1); ■ RCFC 12(d) Conversion of RCFC 12(b)(6) Motion to RCFC 56 Motion

OPINION AND ORDER

CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge

Plaintiff Jose Mendez (Mendez) was a confidential informant whose assistance and cooperation, over roughly nine years, contributed to the government’s successful criminal prosecution of numerous mafia principals and subsequent forfeiture of their…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Marchena v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Moda Health Plan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Villars v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Fisher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Big Will Trucking, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API