Legal Opinion

Botany Worsted Mills v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 2, 1929No. 31PublishedCited by 771 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford

delivered -the opinion of the Court.

The Botany Worsted Mills, a New Jersey corporation engaged in the manufacture of woolen and worsted fabrics, made a return of its net income for the taxable year 1917 under the Revenue Act of 1916 1 and the War Revenue Act of 1917. 2 By § 12(a) of the Revenue Act it was provided that in ascertaining the net income of a corporation organized in the United States there should be deducted from its gross income all “ the ordinary and necessary expenses paid within the year in the maintenance and operation of its business and properties.” Under this provision…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winton v. AmosSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Scott v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. United States v. Philadelphia Knitting Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by771 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. National Assn. of Railroad PassengersSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Gajewski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  5. United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

766 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API