Botany Worsted Mills v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford
delivered -the opinion of the Court.
The Botany Worsted Mills, a New Jersey corporation engaged in the manufacture of woolen and worsted fabrics, made a return of its net income for the taxable year 1917 under the Revenue Act of 1916 1 and the War Revenue Act of 1917. 2 By § 12(a) of the Revenue Act it was provided that in ascertaining the net income of a corporation organized in the United States there should be deducted from its gross income all “ the ordinary and necessary expenses paid within the year in the maintenance and operation of its business and properties.” Under this provision…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Winton v. AmosSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Scott v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- United States v. Philadelphia Knitting Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by771 opinions
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. National Assn. of Railroad PassengersSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gajewski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
- United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
766 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.