Legal Opinion
City of San Leandro v. Highsmith
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 28, 1981No. Civ. 49802PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARRY-DEAL, J.
The property owners appeal from an order denying their motion for litigation expenses pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1250.410 1 following an interlocutory judgment of condemnation of their property on September 26, 1979.
Appellants contend that respondent was apprised of their demand of $550,000 as just compensation by their deposition and that the actual trial date, rather than the original trial date which had been continued because of court congestion, was the controlling date for the 30-day notice of demand. They further maintain that the condemner’s offer…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fuller v. LindenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- County of Los Angeles v. KranzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Lake County Sanitation District v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- STATE OF CALIF., STATE PUB. WORKS BD. v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Coachella Valley County Water District v. DreyfussCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Community Redevelopment Agency v. KrauseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Santa Clara Valley Water District v. GrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- City of El Monte v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- County of San Diego v. WoodwardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Gardella SquareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.