Legal Opinion
City of El Monte v. Ramirez
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 1982No. Civ. 62768PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON (Thaxton), J.
Defendants Carlos C. and Jeanette R. Ramirez and Ezekiel Pinedo and Carmen P. Arguijo appeal a judgment of condemnation of portions of the residential lots owned by the respective couples in this action by the City of El Monte (hereinafter referred to as the City) solely insofar as it fails to compensate defendants for litigation expenses.
Facts
On April 30, 1979, the City filed a complaint in eminent domain against the Ramirezes as to parcel No. 150. On May 4, 1979, the City filed a separate complaint in eminent domain against the Arguijos as to parcel No. 151. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Mehl v. People Ex Rel. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- County of Los Angeles v. KranzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- City of Gardena v. CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Lake County Sanitation District v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Redevelopment Agency v. GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. YukiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- New Haven Unified School District v. Taco Bell Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- People Ex Rel. Department of Water Resources v. AndresenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Redevelopment Agency v. First Christian ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.