Legal Opinion

Zechiel v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1920No. L. A. No. 5271PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

This is an action by an infant through his

guardian ad litem to recover damages sustained by being run into by an autotruck belonging to and operated by defendant. The infant, a boy four and one-half years of age and crippled by the loss of both legs from about the knee down, was riding a tricycle propelled by his hands, his accustomed mode of locomotion. He was in the yard of a house occupied by his grandmother, and was proceeding-on his tricycle to enter upon and cross the street toward the home of his own parents nearly opposite. The truck of defendant, which had been standing at the curb…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herzig v. SandbergMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Dyke v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Amundson v. ShaferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Schultz v. StarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. L. D. Pearson & Son v. BonnieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Devecchio v. RickettsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Reak v. BorsiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Georgia Casualty Co. v. Lindauer Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API