Georgia Casualty Co. v. Lindauer Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TAPPAAN, J., pro tem.
Appellant instituted this action to recover certain moneys expended by it, for one Buis, for medical services and compensation and for future compensa tion to be paid him. The injured man, Buis, was the employee of certain independent contractors, and was injured while working on a bin which was a part of respondent’s rock-crusher. The action is brought under the provisions of sections 26 (Stats. 1917, p. 831, as amended by Stats. 1919, p. 920) and 30 (2f) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
The judgment was in defendant’s favor and from this judgment plaintiff appeals,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rath v. BankstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Haight v. HaightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Zechiel v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Rosewarn v. Washington Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1890