Legal Opinion
Devecchio v. Ricketts
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 25, 1924No. Civ. No. 2731PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
Plaintiff instituted this action for the recovery of damages on account of personal injuries and loss of time suffered by reason of having been run into by an automobile driven by an employee of the defendants. The defendants had judgment and the plaintiff, appeals.
It appears from the pleadings and transcript in this case that on or about 6:30 A. M. on the tenth day of January, 1922, while the plaintiff was walking along a certain street in the city of Madera known as Yosemite Avenue in the direction of Pine Street on the way to his employment, he was run into by an autotruck belonging to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Raymond v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Deputy v. KimmellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Randolph v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Woodhead v. WilkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Lawyer v. Los Angeles Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Lawson v. FordyceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. ScamellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Olson v. MeachamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- People v. LettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.