Legal Opinion

Amundson v. Shafer

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1918No. Civ. No. 2060PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

WORKS, J., pro tem.

This is an action of unlawful detainer in which the defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The amended complaint alleges, among other things, that the plaintiff is a married woman, but that “the matters alleged in this complaint” concern her sole and separate estate; that “the plaintiff herein is, and was, during all the times herein mentioned, the sole owner and proprietress of that certain business carried on under the name of the Amundson Drug Company,” in the city of Los Angeles; that the defendant has been in possession of a certain portion of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holden v. MensingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Jager v. California Bridge Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hoffman v. Guy M. Rush Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Brown v. RatliffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Treat v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Manfre v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Allen, Exr. v. EtterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Curtin v. SalomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Fairbairn v. FairbairnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API