Legal Opinion

Dyke v. Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1914No. 11923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered December 9, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in an action in tort.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The purpose of this action was to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by Mrs. Van Dyke, one of the plaintiffs, when two automobiles collided.

The plaintiffs are husband and wife. The defendants, D. A. Johnson and Rose Johnson, his wife, are the parents of Harold P. Johnson, the other defendant. The cause was tried to a jury. Prom a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendants, the plaintiffs have appealed.

The accident occurred at the intersection of Tenth avenue north, and east Aloha street, in the city of Seattle. Tenth avenue north, is a north and south street. East Aloha…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Swanson v. Pacific Shipping Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Spoar v. Turn-VereinWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. International Development Co. v. SangerWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Webb v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Luther v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. McClelland v. Pacific Northwest Traction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Shelley v. NormanWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Tooker v. PerkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API