Schultz v. Starr
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Floyd District Court, — 'O. H. Kelley, Judge. Action for damages resulting from the alleged negligence of defendant in operating a motor cycle. Trial to a' jury. Verdict and judgment in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
This is an action for damages claimed to have resulted to plaintiff from a collision of his bicycle with the motor cycle of defendant. The accident occurred at the intersection of Kelly and Brantingham Streets in Charles City, Iowa. The negligence charged is that the defendant was, at the time, operating his motor cycle at a high and dangerous rate of speed, and in a careless, reckless and imprudent manner, and in excess of the speed limit prescribed by the ordinances of Charles City; and that he failed to have the same equipped with proper horn or bell, and to sound a signal or give warning…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Keyes v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Rule v. CareySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Mitchell v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Bracket v. BracketSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Baker v. MathewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ryan v. TrenkleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Shannon v. GaarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Isaacs v. BruceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Dawson v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bennett v. Central California Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.