Legal Opinion

State v. Dominguez-Coronado

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 12, 2007No. 04C50555; A128779PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of two counts of delivery of a controlled substance (DCS). Former ORS 475.992 (2003). On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in failing to merge the two convictions. The state responds that defendant failed to preserve the assignment of error. We agree with the state that defendant failed to preserve the assignment and that the trial court’s decision not to merge the convictions was not plainly erroneous. We therefore affirm.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. Salem police officers arrested defendant’s brother for attempting to sell one ounce (28 grams) of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. Reyes-CamarenaOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. State v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Staten v. SteelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. Dominguez-CoronadoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. McMillinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Staten v. SteelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API