Legal Opinion

State v. Dominguez-Coronado

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 16, 2008No. 04C50555; A128779PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

In May 2005, defendant was convicted of two counts of delivery of a controlled substance. Former ORS 475.992(4)(a) (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840 (2005). He appealed, arguing in his sole assignment of error that the trial court erred in failing to merge the convictions. In September 2007, we issued a decision in which we determined that defendant had failed to preserve that issue and that it did not constitute plain error; we therefore affirmed his convictions. State v. Dominguez-Coronado, 215 Or App 7, 168 P3d 291 (2007).

In April 2007, however, the Supreme Court had issued its decision in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BirchfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. MarroquinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Bertram v. Malheur CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Kinross Copper Corp. v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. Dominguez-CoronadoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. WestbrookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. CaprarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. DOMINGUEZ-CORONADOOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API