Legal Opinion

Staten v. Steel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 20, 2008No. 160515033; A133080PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*20BREWER, C. J.

Defendant Falbo appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict for a total of $110,000 on plaintiffs claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy. Plaintiff dismissed his claims against other defendants during the trial. Those other defendants appeal from the trial court’s refusal to award them sanctions or attorney fees against plaintiff and his attorney. We conclude that the trial court’s actions that are the basis for Falbo’s primary assignments of error are not reviewable on appeal and that none of the assignments of error that are…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Price v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Neumann v. LilesOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Englert v. MacDonellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Mullen v. Meredith Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Young v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Page v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API