Legal Opinion

State v. Porter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 16, 2005No. 0002-42642; A120069PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010(1). To decide the merits of his appeal, we must determine the nature and effect of his acknowledgment, in a written agreement between him and the prosecution and in statements he made in court under oath, that he had driven while affected by alcohol at the time and place indicated in the citation. Defendant argues that the contents of the agreement and statements were merely evidentiary admissions that he was entitled to contest. The state characterizes them as stipulations with the effect of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. CargillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Foxton v. WoodmanseeOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Johnson v. Northwest Acceptance CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. ManzellaOregon Supreme Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Dominguez-CoronadoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. A. F. v. Oregon Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. EngersethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. Sawyer v. Real Estate AgencyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API