Legal Opinion
CPT Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 10, 1994No. C9-93-2068PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul) seeks review of the trial court’s order denying its posttrial motions. St. Paul contends the trial court erred in concluding: (1) St. Paul had a duty to defend respondent CPT Corporation, Inc. (CPT) in an underlying action; (2) St. Paul had a duty to indemnify CPT; and (3) St. Paul must contribute to the amount paid to settle the underlying action by CPT’s other insurer, respondent Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna).
FACTS
In October 1988, three former CPT employees brought a federal suit against…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Prahm v. Rupp Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Smith v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Garrick v. Northland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Northland Insurance Co. v. Continental Western Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- North Star Mutual Insurance Co v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- United States Fidelity & Guarantee Insurance Company v. Commercial Union Midwest Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- GREAT WEST CAS. v. General Cas. Co. of WisconsinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- American Standard Insurance Co. v. Dang Van LeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.