Legal Opinion

American Standard Insurance Co. v. Dang Van Le

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 13, 1996No. CX-95-1239PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Respondent Dang Van Le (Le) was sued in a tort action brought after his vehicle struck respondent Huong Thi Nyugen (Nyugen). Le tendered defense of the suit to his insurer, appellant American Standard Insurance Company, and the company appointed an attorney to represent Le in the tort action, subject to a reservation of rights. American Standard then commenced a declaratory judgment action against Le to determine coverage. A jury determined that Le had not intentionally injured Nyugen when he struck her with his vehicle. The district court entered judgment in favor of Le…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Morrison v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Lanoue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Garrick v. Northland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cherne Contracting Corp. v. Wausau Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  2. In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage LitigationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API