Legal Opinion

Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 6, 1976No. 45780PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This litigation between two insurance companies presents again the vexing question of how to apportion liability between two insurers of the same risk when the policies of insurance contain conflicting “other insurance” clauses. Insurance companies commonly include in their policies other insurance clauses which tend to limit their liability on the risk if the insured has similar insurance available from another company. Some companies use a pro rata clause, limiting the insurer’s liability to that fraction of the loss which the insurer’s limit of liability is of all…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Federal Insurance Company v. PrestemonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Garrick v. Northland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Nordby v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API