Legal Opinion
Aycock v. Harriman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 24, 1939No. 28899PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
The present controversy arose from the efforts of the successful plaintiff in a foreclosure action to enforce the decree entered therein.
The parties appear here as they appeared in the trial court and will be referred to by their trial court designation.
After having obtained judgment against the mortgagors for recovery on a certain promissory note and for the foreclosure of the real estate mortgage securing the indebtedness represented thereby, the plaintiff caused a special execution and order of sale to issue against said real estate. The sale was had, and before it was confirmed said…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lillard v. MeisbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Rogers v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- In Re EpleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. HarrowerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Bartlett Mortgage Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Taylor v. HynsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Jackson v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. BreedingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Norris v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.