Legal Opinion
Lillard v. Meisberger
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 8, 1925No. 15166PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This case is appealed from the district court of Oklahoma county, and defendant in error files a motion to dismiss the appeal: First, because the case-made was settled and signed without notice and before the time had expired in which to suggest amendments; second, because J- W. Barns, one of the defendants below, was not served with case-made: and third, because order extending time in Which to serve easemiade has no legal significance and does not extend the time.
The record shiclwts that the case-made was settled and signed on the same day that the time expired in which to serve same. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Collinsville v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- MacKin v. Darrow Music Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Roof v. FranksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- In Re GarlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Aycock v. HarrimanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Fairmont Creamery Co. v. CarstenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Aven v. ReehSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Little v. Employer's Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.