Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Harris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 21, 1919No. 9035PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Tulsa County; M. A. Breckenridge, Judge. Action by Vernon V. Harris against Harry H. Rogers, James A. Chapman, and the Mc-Man Oil Company, to cancel conveyances of certain lands and oil leases conveyed by him to the Oil Company, and by the Oil Company to Rogers. Judgment for plaintiff and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, C. J.

Harris alleges Chapman and Rogers conspired together to defraud him bf his interest in partnership property, wita the intention of purchasing same for Rogers, and that Rogers induced him to. sell his interest for an inadequate consideration, by falsely representing that he, Rogers, was selling for a like amount, and by concealing the real value of the property.

Chapman denies he conspired with Rogers or practiced any fraud on Harris, or purchased his interest for the use and benefit of Rogers. He alleges he purchased the Harris interest in good faith for the McMan Oil Company, and that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moore v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Owen v. United States Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. McLean v. Southwestern Casualty Ins. Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. James v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Miller v. MarksUtah Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Aycock v. HarrimanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Foster v. DwireNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. United Engines, Inc. v. McConnell Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Derdyn v. LowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Johnson v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API