Legal Opinion
Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Breeding
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 16, 1954No. 4631PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from an order denying a motion to revive the original judgment and the supplemental judgment entered in this cause. For convenience, reference will be made to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation as the Finance Corporation; to Glenn E. Breeding and Irene Breeding as the Breedings; and to Tri-State Motor Transport, Inc., Opal Bowlin Lyman, and the administrator of the estate of Lucille Lyman Porter, deceased, as the third parties.
The Finance Corporation instituted the action against the Breedings to recover upon a promissory note and to foreclose certain…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Minnesota Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. JG Menihan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Oklahoma Radio Associates v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Willis v. Nowata Land and Cattle Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. OlsonDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1991
- Robert R. Ingerton v. First National Bank and Trust Company of TulsaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- United States v. Paul B. Miller and Mildred E. Miller, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.