Legal Opinion

Bartlett Mortgage Co. v. Morrison

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 28, 1938No. 28158PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAYLESS, Y. C. J.

Bartlett Mortgage Company appeals from the action of the district court of Blaine county refusing to revive a judgment in favor of it and against Harvy James Morrison et al.

The objection to the motion to revive was based upon the ground that the judgment ' had become dormant and more than one year had passed thereafter, by reason of which the court was without authority to revive the judgment over the objection of defendants. Bartlett’s theory was that it was precluded by law from issuing execution for a period of time after judgment was rendered, and that this period should…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Glazier Ex Rel. Estate of Glazier v. HeneybussSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Tracey v. CrepinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Kerr v. McKinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Chouteau v. HossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Paschal Inv. Co. v. AtwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Aycock v. HarrimanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. BreedingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Fenimore v. State ex rel. Com'rs of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  5. Baker v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API