Legal Opinion

Smith v. Chase & Baker Piano Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1913No. Docket No. 53PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Oakland; Smith, J. Assumpsit by John L. Smith against the Chase & Baker Piano Manufacturing Company on a contract of hiring. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

The plaintiff brought suit against the defendant to recover installments of salary for the months of May and June, 1912, which he claimed as superintendent and manager of the defendant’s factory at Holly, Mich., under a parol contract of employment made February 1, 1910, for at least three years from its date. The declaration contains a special count and the common counts, and the allega*372tions with reference to the agreement in the special count are as follows:

“And the plaintiff avers that thereupon, to wit, on the 1st day of February, 1910, the said defendant entered into a special contract…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scott v. BeecherMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Schurr v. SavignyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Sines v. Superintendents of the PoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Fuller v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Shaw v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Landis v. W. H. Fuqua, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Westerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Paul v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. In re Moon's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Smith v. Chase & Baker Piano Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API