Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Rice

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1884PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Oceana. (Russell, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, O. J.

Plaintiff sued to recover for services performed by him under an oral contract whereby, as he testified, he agreed with defendant to cut, skid, haul and put on the bank of the south branch of Pentwater river in Elbridge township, six hundred thousand feet of logs; two hundred thousand feet in the season of 1880, and two hundred thousand feet in each of the two succeeding years; and also to clear the river from obstructions and then deliver the logs at Hart or at Wigton & Bosworth’s mill-pond. For these services he testified he was to be paid as follows: For cutting and banking…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen v. McKibbinMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Whipple v. ParkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Wildey v. Fractional School District Number OneMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Burroughs v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Landis v. W. H. Fuqua, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Paul v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Pierce v. StaubSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  5. Antonoff v. BassoMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API