Legal Opinion

Smith v. Chase & Baker Piano Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1915No. Docket No. 56PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Oakland; Smith, J. Assumpsit by Joseph C. Smith, as administrator of the estate of John L. Smith, deceased, against the Chase & Baker Piano Manufacturing Company for services performed. Judgment for plaintiff, on a directed verdict, for an insufficient amount, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiff’s intestate made an oral agreement with defendant to become superintendent and manager of its Holly plant, from the 1st day of February, 1910, for a term of not less than three years, at an annual salary of $5,000, to be paid in monthly installments. He worked under this oral agreement until the middle of May, 1912, and received his pay therefor to May 1, 1912. Soon after July 1, 1912, he commenced this suit and recovered his monthly salary for the months of May and June. On writ of error to this court, the case was reversed for the reason that the plaintiff declared and relied upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fuller v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Smith v. Chase & Baker Piano Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Moore v. NasonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Landis v. W. H. Fuqua, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Paul v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Ordon v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Geistert v. SchefflerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API