Paul v. Graham
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Calhoun; North, J. Assumpsit by H. M. Paul against William B. Graham, C. W. Shriver, George W. Dunham, and E. C. Humpidge, copartners as Graham & Shriver Company, for commissions on the sale of real estate. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
The defendants were owners of land near Ft. Myers in the State of Florida, and were engaged in selling the same in small tracts of five acres and upwards, upon contracts containing provisions for developing the land by planting grape fruit and orange groves, and caring for them for a stated period. Some time between the 25th day of August and the 6th day of September, 1913, defendants made a verbal agreement with the plaintiff to assist in selling the tracts on commission. The terms of the verbal agreement are in dispute, both as to the amount of the commission to be allowed and the territory…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gault v. StormontMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- McCarthy v. LoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Hall v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Fuller v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Blair v. AustinNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Baugh v. DarleyUtah Supreme Court · 1947
- Landis v. W. H. Fuqua, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Hale v. KreiselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Krause v. BoraksMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Smith v. StarkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.