Scott v. Beecher
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
This is an action for rent. Defendants ‘leased the premises for one year from May 1, 1889. The rent was payable monthly in advance. On the 1st day •of April, 1890, according to the testimony of defendants, plaintiff came to collect the rent, at which time defendants said to her “ that the store, under its present conditions, was not suitable for our business; that we were looking for another store, and, if we succeeded in finding one, we should move, and we did not intend to stay in that store another year.” It was not claimed that plaintiff made any reply. On the 1st of May, 1890, ■…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schuyler v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Gunzberg v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Conway v. StarkweatherCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Anderson v. PrindleCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1840
- Prickett v. RitterIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Higgins v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Levitt v. ZindlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Mahoney v. LesterMontana Supreme Court · 1946
- Oldewurtel v. WiesenfeldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
- Faraci v. FassuloMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.