Shaw v. Armstrong
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. (Edget, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The controversy in this case involves the sum of $200.
The plaintiff sues in assumpsit upon the common counts, and filed his bill of particulars, the item of such bill in dispute being as follows: '
“1888, Nov. 1. To six months’ service of two steam fire-tugs, E. Haight and C. P. Pish, as per agreement, $500.”
The plaintiff testified that after some negotiations as to this labor, before the service was performed, with the defendant* in which they did not agree as to the price, *312the defendant offering $300 and plaintiff asking $500, the defendant said to him in substance that whatever bargain he…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Alderton v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Moon's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Geistert v. SchefflerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Millar v. MacEy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Vanderhoef v. Parker Bros. Co., Ltd.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Ruttle v. FossMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.