Legal Opinion

Beltz v. Griggs

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1933No. 31,087PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This is an action by a landowner against a common-law trust to which he had conveyed an undivided one-half interest in the oil, gas and mineral royalty in a quarter section of land in Ness county, Kansas, and the grantees of the common-law trust, to quiet his title against them, for the reason that the conveyance had been procured from him by misrepresentations and *430fraud and without consideration, and the subsequent conveyances were executed contrary to law and accepted and recorded by the grantees with full knowledge of the fraud and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frazier v. JeakinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Home Lumber Co. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Hamilton v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. Moos v. Landowners Oil Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Weber Engine Co. v. AlterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Westhusin v. Landowners Oil Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Fitch v. United Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. WorcesterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Sauberli v. SleddSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Ward v. Home Royalty AssociationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API