Sauberli v. Sledd

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This action was brought by the receiver uf a corporation to recover from defendant alleged misappropriations of money which it is claimed belonged to the corporation.

A demurrer to defendant’s amended answer was sustained. From *351that ruling he appeals. Review of that ruling requires analysis of the petition and amended answer. The petition contained two causes of action. The material allegations in the first cause of action contained, in substance are: On or about July 14, 1933, plaintiff was duly appointed by the judge of the district court…