Hamilton v. Young
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 2; Thornton W. Sargent, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
The action was one to recover on a promissory note. The district court directed a verdict for defendants, on the pleadings and opening statements of counsel. Plaintiff appeals.
The petition alleged that Charles and Young executed and delivered to plaintiff their promissory note, which was due and unpaid. A copy of the note was made part of the petition. The no.te was in the ordinary form of a “We promise to pay” negotiable instrument, and was signed, “The Victory Oil Company, By U. G. Charles, President. Attest: Fred C. Young, Secretary.” The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Megowan v. . PetersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Home Lumber Co. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Rand v. FarquharMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- American Trust Co. v. CanevinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
- State v. ToliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hemphill v. OrloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- State Street Trust Co. v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Page v. Arkansas Natural Gas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Reilly v. ClyneArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Darling v. BuddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.