Legal Opinion

Westhusin v. Landowners Oil Ass'n

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1936No. 32,642PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, C. J.:

The action was one by landowners to cancel a mineral royalty conveyance. The district court canceled the conveyance, and quieted the landowners’ title. Defendant appeals.

The defendant, The Landowners Oil Association, is a Delaware corporation, engaged in operating a pool of oil and gas royalty interests, pursuant to a plan heretofore considered by this court. (Moos v. Landowners Oil Ass’n, 136 Kan. 424, 15 P. 2d 1073, November, 1932. See, also, Beltz v. Griggs, 137 Kan. 429, 20 P. 2d 510, April, 1933; Ward v. Home Royalty Ass’n, 142 Kan.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Westerlund v. Black Bear Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  2. Moos v. Landowners Oil Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. Beltz v. GriggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Ward v. Home Royalty AssociationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  5. Flick v. MurdockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Midwest Management Corp. v. StephensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Herl v. State Bank of ParsonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Terrill v. Home Royalty Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Popper v. Havana Publications, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  5. Tawney v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API