Fitch v. United Royalty Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
This was an action to cancel a deed conveying a royalty interest in Sumner county land to the United Royalty Company, a common-law trust domiciled in Oklahoma.
The pertinent facts were these: In August, 1922, three men, Rochel, Burnham and Landon, organized a common-law trust for accumulating and pooling oil-and-gas royalty interests in lands. The organizers gave it the name of The United Royalty Company, assumed its management as trustees, and filed a declaration of trust specifying its nature and purposes in a public record office-in Kay…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- People v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Frazier v. JeakinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Home Lumber Co. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Reilly v. ClyneArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Beneke v. Bankers Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Froelich v. United Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
- Tulsa Rock Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Terrill v. Home Royalty Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Popper v. Havana Publications, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Marth v. Industrial Incomes Incorporated of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.