Legal Opinion

London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Co. v. Liebes

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1894No. 15784PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

This appeal is from a judgment entered in favor of defendant, Jacob Liebes, upon his demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint. Louis Liebes was not served.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff, on January 27, 1890, issued to Liebes Brothers & Co., a firm composed of Jacob and Louis Liebes, a policy of insurance in the sum of $2,500 upon merchandise, consisting of cigars and tobacco, in a building on Davis street in the city and county of San Francisco. Other insurance was carried by the insured in some fifteen other companies, the total amount carried being $59,500.

That on November 13,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frisch v. CalerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Patterson v. DonnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Holton v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Scroufe v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Barney v. VigoreauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Woodham v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Tower v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Nelson v. GrondahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. United Real Estate & Tr. Co. v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Marshall v. SwaimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API