Barney v. Vigoreaux
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a motion to vacate the judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
The record shows that the plaintiff brought his action against the defendant upon a promissory note, of which a copy is contained in the complaint. Copies of several receipts of payments, which it is alleged were indorsed upon said promissory note, are set out in the complaint, and plaintiff demands judgment for $340, balance of principal, with interest, etc.
There is no allegation that no part of the sum for which said note was given, except the sums indorsed upon it, has been paid.
The defendant did not appear in the action, although there was proof of the service of summons upon him, and his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Frisch v. CalerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Scroufe v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Davanay v. EggenhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by15 opinions
- Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Penrose v. WinterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Ryan v. HollidayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Hawley Bros. Hardware Co. v. BrownstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Davie's v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.