Woodham v. Allen
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. M. T. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for defendant following an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
The complaint sets forth that on the nineteenth day of August the defendant filed a complaint against and caused the arrest of one Newman on a charge of larceny of defendant’s goods, and about the same time accused Woodham, the husband of plaintiff, with complicity in said crime and with knowingly and feloniously receiving said goods from Newman after they had heen stolen, and demanded that Woodham pay him four hundred dollars, claimed by defendant to be the value of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schultz v. CulbertsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Bentley v. RobsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Heckman v. SwartzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Co. v. LiebesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by30 opinions
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- McAllister v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Fuhrman v. California Satellite SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Colby v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.