Holton v. Noble
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order allowing judgment on the pleadings. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Appeal by defendants. This action was brought to recover rent due on a written lease executed by plaintiff to defendants for one year, commencing *8January 5, 1888, and ending the 5th of January, 1889. The lease was for two years, commencing on the day above mentioned, in 1888, and ending on the fifth day of January, 1890. The stipulated rent was three thousand two .hundred dollars a year for the first year, payable on the twentieth day of December, 1888, and for the second year, on the same day of December, 1889. The defendants went into possession under the lease, and occupied the premises…
2Cited by34 opinions
- Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Stuck v. Delta Land & Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
- B. & W. Engineering Co. v. BeamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Moving Picture MacHine Operators Union Local No. 162 v. Glasgow Theaters, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Swasey v. De L'EtancheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.