Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Grondahl

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1903PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Cass County; Charles A. Pollock, J. Action by Peter Nelson against Olaf L. Grondahl. Judgment for defendant, and, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff, as owner of a note for $250 made by one Paul Steffes to the defendant, and by him indorsed to the plaintiff. Two defenses are interposed: (1) That the indorsement and delivery of the note to the plaintiff were procured through the false and fraudulent representations of the plaintiff to the defendant; (2) that no notice of the dishonor and nonpayment of the note by the maker was ever given to the defendant. The jury foun4 a verdict in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff moved for a new trial in due time upon a settled statement of the case. This motion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richmire v. Andrews & Gale Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Bragg v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Bodkin v. MeritIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Alden v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  5. Bartlett v. BlaineIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sonnesyn v. AkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Beidler & Robinson Lumber Co. v. Coe Commission Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Olson v. Ottertail Power Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Fink v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Olstad v. Stockgrowers Credit Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API