Tower v. Wilson
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.
This is an action brought to recover the sum of $148,750, the difference between the sum of one hundred and seventy-five thousand dollars plaintiff paid for a one-half interest in certain mining property, and one-half of the amount alleged to have been the actual price of the same, and claimed to be a secret profit, made by J. C. Wilson, confidential agent of plaintiff, in the purchase of a mine to be operated as a joint adventure. After the trial, and before judgment, defendant John C. Wilson was duly adjudged a bankrupt, and F. J. Solinsky, as trustee of said bankrupt, was permitted to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Blanc v. ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Krasky v. WollpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Wilcox v. SwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- San Jose Abstract & Title Insurance v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Parker v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Whann v. DoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.