Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Investigation (General Motors Corp.)
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 17, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGOHEY, District Judge.
General Motors has moved to quash a subpoena duces tecum which was caused to be issued by Government attorneys commanding the corporation to appear before a grand jury in this district to testify and give evidence in regard to “an alleged violation of the federal antitrust law”; and to produce “documents and items” described in an attached schedule. The latter covers 13 legal size pages and consists of 16 numbered paragraphs most of which are subdivided into sub-paragraphs ranging in number from 2 to 18.
The motion is granted.
Whether, as counsel for the corporation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
- McMann v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- In re United Shoe Machinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1947
3Cited by6 opinions
- Horizons Titanium Corporation v. Norton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, Etc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Federal Trade Commission v. Hunt Foods & Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1959
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued to Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc., Dated August 13, 1975District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1975
- Carvel Corp. v. LefkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.