Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, Etc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 6, 1961PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
The petitioner, Local 627, Provision Salesmen and Distributors Union, A.F.L.C.I.O., has moved to quash or modify a subpoena duces tecum addressed to it by a federal grand jury investigating alleged violations of the federal antitrust laws. The grand jury is seeking to determine whether there were unlawful agreements among manufacturers, jobbers, retailers and unions, including Local 627, in the processed meat industry, to fix prices, allocate customers, maintain boycotts and to enforce these restraints (Government’s supplemental affidavit, para. 1).
The Local asserts…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Harry I. Schwimmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- In Re AddonizioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- United States v. LurosDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1965
- United States v. John E. Gurule, and Harold K. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum, Etc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.