Legal Opinion
In re United Shoe Machinery Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 24, 1947No. 7262PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, District Judge.
Motions to quash have been filed by each of the above named movants. Each of them has been served with a subpoena duces tecum, returnable Februaly 10, 1947, before a Grand Jury, directing them to bring with them “the material designated in the annexed list”. The annexed list comprises 14 pages of designations.
The United Shoe Machinery Corporation is the owner of all of the stock of the other movant corporations. In addition thereto, the United Shoe Machinery Corporation, which will hereinafter be referred to as “United”, owns 100% of the voting power in about 35 other…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- File Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- In re Certain Chinese Family Benevolent & District Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956
- In re Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1947
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation (General Motors Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.