Legal Opinion
United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 18, 1953No. Civ. A. 7198PublishedCited by 205 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI, District Judge.
Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Opinions.
I
■ Introduction.
December IS, 1947 the Government filed a complaint against United Shoe Machinery-Corporation under § 4 of the Sherman Act, Act of July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U.S.C.A. § 4 in order to restrain alleged violations of §§ 1 and 2 of tliat Act, 26 Stat. 209, SO Stat. 693, IS U.S.C.A. '§§ 1, 2.
Stripped to its essentials, the 52 page complaint charged, first, that since 1912 United had been “monopolizing interstate trade and commerce in the shoe machinery industry of the United States” [Par. 27…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Fashion Originators' Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by205 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.