Legal Opinion

Hubbell v. Iseke

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1986No. 11079PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*486OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HEEN, J.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Victoria Hubbell (Victoria) and her husband George K. Hubbell (George) (hereinafter collectively referred to as Plaintiffs) appeal the judgment entered against them upon a special jury verdict, and the trial court’s denial of their motion for a new trial. We affirm.

I

On January 29, 1983, Victoria and her son-in-law were travelling by car to a family reunion at the home of Whitney Iseke in Hauula, Oahu. Because neither Victoria nor her son-in-law knew where Whitney Iseke lived, they went first to Defendant-Appellee, Jason Iseke’s (Jason)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pickard v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  2. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Farrior v. PaytonHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Stahl v. BalsaraHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Black Construction Corp. v. AgsaludHawaii Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Mikelson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Mikelson v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASS'NHawaii Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API