Alohacare v. Department of Human Services, State of Hawaii.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
ACOBA, J.
We hold (1) that Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant AlohaCare (Petitioner), a bidder for a health and human services contract under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) 103F, may not appeal the denial of a contract award by Respondent/Defendant-Appellee the Department of Human Services (Respondent) under the procedures set forth in HRS chapter 103D (pertaining generally to other State procurement contracts) that afford judicial review for bidders denied protests; (2) however, as construed, HRS chapter 103F does not prohibit judicial review of the administrative denial of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Kadia v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Sandy Beach Defense Fund v. City CouncilHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
- McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Skaskiw and Vermont Volunteer Services for Animals Humane SocietySupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Hussey v. SayHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014
- Kilakila ‘O Haleakala v. Board of Land and Natural Resources.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013