Legal Opinion

Burdge v. Palmateer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 2003No. 97C-12207; A108298PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*297BREWER, J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. We write only to address petitioner’s claim that his trial counsel was inadequate in failing to object to the imposition of sentences under ORS 137.635.1 We conclude that petitioner has established that trial counsel’s performance was constitutionally inadequate and that petitioner was prejudiced by that deficiency. Accordingly, we reverse.

Petitioner was convicted in 1994 of five criminal charges in three separate cases. The crimes were committed in the following order: Case No. 1 involved a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Stevens v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. BucholzOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Chew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burdge v. PalmateerOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Jackson v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Burdge v. BellequeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Williamson v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Alcazar v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API