Burdge v. Palmateer
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*492RIGGS, J.
The issue in this post-conviction proceeding is whether petitioner’s lawyer provided constitutionally adequate assistance at petitioner’s criminal trials. In the criminal cases, the trial court applied a particular statute to increase petitioner’s sentences. Petitioner’s lawyer did not challenge whether the statute applied. Two years later, in a different case, the Court of Appeals interpreted that statute and concluded that it could not be used to enhance sentences in cases like petitioner’s. The post-conviction court rejected petitioner’s petition for relief, but the Court of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Lichau v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Gorham v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Montez v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Miller v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Antoine v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- Gable v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Montez v. CzerniakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.