Chew v. State
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*476DEITS, P. J.
Petitioner appeals from an order denying his petition for post-conviction relief; he argues that he was denied adequate assistance of trial counsel under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution and under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Petitioner claims that he received inadequate assistance of counsel because, inter alia, his attorney did not inform him that, if he pleaded guilty to DUII and subsequently drove while his driver’s license was suspended, the resulting charge of driving while suspended (DWS) could be prosecuted as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Moen v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Eric Allen Peterson v. Robert LampertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Warren v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Simpson v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. WilkersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.