Legal Opinion

State v. Bucholz

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1993No. CC 10-90-02791, 10-90-03187; CA A65640, A65641; SC S39681PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.

The issue in this case is whether defendant’s sentence exceeds that permitted by the sentencing guidelines, because his convictions under a first indictment should not have been counted as criminal history for sentencing on the conviction arising from another indictment. Defendant was charged in one indictment with theft in the first degree, a Class C felony offense against property. ORS 164.055. As charged one month and eight days later in a separate indictment defendant committed other crimes, including the Class A felony of unlawful delivery of methamphetamine to a minor. ORS 475.995(1).

On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RuonaMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State v. RacicotCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. CastrejonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. JensenOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. SealsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. M. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API