Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. City of Stuttgart

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 8, 1936No. 4-4382PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.

This is a suit to enjoin the city of Stuttgart from issuing bonds in the sum of $75,000 for the purpose of constructing, widening, straightening, and paving streets, alleys and boulevards within said, city, and to restrain the collection of a tax levied to pay same. It was estimated that this could be done at a cost of about $160,000, which amount could be raised through a bond issue of $75,000, bearing interest at the rate of 4 per cent, per annum, and a direct gift of $61,000 from the PWA.

Amendment No. 13 to our Constitution authorizes cities of the first and second class to issue bonds to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. County of ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Society for Savings v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
  3. Supervisors v. GalbraithSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Hargraves v. SolomonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Atkinson v. Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arkansas-Missouri Power Corp. v. City of RectorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  2. Tunnah v. Moyer, MayorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  3. Whetstone v. City of StuttgartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  4. Arkansas-Missouri Power Corp. v. City of RectorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  5. East v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API